Tuesday, June 01, 2010

The End has begun

One of the greatest streaks in sport has been broken. The man who has stridden the tennis world like a Goliath - with the 'lesser' Goliath occasionally bringing him down - has fallen by the wayside in a Grand Slam. The last time this happened was nearly six years ago. That is an incredible, mind-boggling 260-odd weeks! His records speak for themselves.

The slide which led to the eventual fall today - if you can call a failure to reach the semi-finals stage of a Grand Slam for the 24th successive time that - began late last year, when the Federer Express was jolted to a halt at the US Open in the finals. It was the very first Grand Slam final that Federer had lost to a man not named Nadal. Quite uncharacteristically, he was smiling broadly after that loss, downplaying it, and pointing out that he had had a fantastic year, having won the French Open for the first (and perhaps, only) time in his career, and capping his year by regaining his beloved Wimbledon crown. Gone was the sour mood that one would be able to detect during the mandatory press conference (after yet another Grand Slam loss to Nadal) and, arguably, the burning desire to win. Though his next Grand Slam success, at this year's Australian Open, was definitely not a fluke, I couldn't shake off the feeling that the man had lost his intensity, the hunger that fuels the greatest of champions to keep going long after the good and very good players have stopped trying.

What a fanciful mistress fate can be. Nobody who had seen Federer weep after losing the 2009 Australian Open to Nadal would have dared imagine that the year would be what it turned out to be for him. When Nadal was beaten by Soderling at the French Open, the tennis fraternity collectively held its breath wondering if this would be the year that Federer would finally break through at the only Grand Slam to be noticeably absent in his masterful collection. Not only did he win it, he went on to win Wimbledon - to some players, the only Grand Slam that matters - probably aided by a serious knee problem that afflicted Nadal. (It will probably go down as the only time in history that two different players have won the French-Wimbledon double in successive years: Nadal did it the previous year, ironically at Federer's expense.)

With the Wimbledon title back in his hands, he also overtook Pete Sampras as the all-time leader of Grand Slam singles title winners, 15 in all. And then, surprisingly for many - including myself - he lost the US Open final to del Potro who, it turned out, was playing an inspired game. However, with no disrespect to the Argentinian, Federer simply wouldn't have lost a final on the hard courts of Flushing Meadows - perhaps not even to Nadal - had it been any other year. But then again, 2009 was not any other year. It was the year he won the career Slam; the year he regained his throne at The Championships; and perhaps most importantly for him as a person, the year he became a father.

There's nothing left for Federer to prove as far as tennis records go. He has already won more Grand Slam singles titles than any man, dead or alive; he holds the record of appearing in 10 consecutive Grand Slam singles finals, and 23 Grand Slam semi-finals; he has been ranked the ATP world No.1 for a record 237 consecutive weeks (the next best is Jimmy Connors, at a 'mere' 160); and he has the best year-end win-loss record next only to John McEnroe's. One could argue that unless he improves his win-loss record with Nadal, or win a calendar Grand Slam, he cannot be called the greatest ever, but if you ask me, those will be mere footnotes in tennis history.

To be sure, I'm not suggesting that Federer's days as a Grand Slam winner are behind him; he may still win a handful, especially when challenged by players who lack self-belief (Andy Murray comes to mind). But against players like del Potro and Soderling - he's more likely to lose than he has in the past, not only because they're exceptionally strong players, but also because the stakes are not as high for him as they were until last year. The King is not exactly dead, but his days as the best currently active player are definitely coming to an end.

4 comments:

Rema said...

A Grand Slam semis without FedEx for the first time in six years - a day I would gladly wish away. It's been a dream run, was reading his interview a couple of days ago where he said for some reason he was worried he wouldn't make it to the semis. Well, the power hitters can come and go, after Laver, he remains THE BEST.

Neat post. The mind agrees with your observation but I'd like him to prove u wrong :-) I do so want to see him play the Wimbledon live, so he better continue playing and winning for a longish time.

Unknown said...

Nice post.. I think Fed has only one grandslam left in him ( altho i ve been proved wrong before )
nadal to win wimbledon for me!!

The Practical Idealist said...

My heart roots for Federer, but my mind says something else. As the old cliche goes, time will tell.

Deepa Iyer said...

And today's match is a clear indication !